{"id":1363,"date":"2004-12-20T13:05:17","date_gmt":"2004-12-20T18:05:17","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2004-12-20T13:05:17","modified_gmt":"2004-12-20T18:05:17","slug":"space-shuttle-milestone-engines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=1363","title":{"rendered":"SPACE SHUTTLE MILESTONE: ENGINES"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>     NASA completed installation this week of the three main engines that will help launch Space Shuttle Discovery on its Return to Flight mission. Installation was completed Dec. 8 at the Orbiter Processing Facility at NASA&#8217;s Kennedy Space Center, Fla.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This milestone concludes the assembly, processing, inspection, data review and tests required for acceptance of engines,&#8221; said Space Shuttle Main Engine project manager, Gene Goldman, at NASA&#8217;s Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe Return to Flight mission, designated STS-114, is targeted for a launch opportunity beginning in May 2005. The seven-member Discovery crew will fly to the International Space Station primarily to test and evaluate new procedures for flight safety, including Space Shuttle inspection and repair techniques.<\/p>\n<p>Returning the Space Shuttle to flight is the first step in realizing the Vision for Space Exploration. The Vision calls for a stepping-stone strategy of human and robotic missions to achieve the nation&#8217;s new exploration goals, starting with returning the Shuttle safely to flight and completing the International Space Station. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Although there is still much work to be done, the engines are the last big components to install on the orbiter prior to rolling over to the Vehicle Assembly Building,&#8221; said Stephanie Stilson, NASA&#8217;s Discovery vehicle manager. &#8220;This shows we&#8217;re moving in the right direction for Return to Flight,&#8221; she added.<\/p>\n<p>Engines number 2057, 2056 and 2054 were installed on Discovery. STS-114 is the first flight for engine 2057, third for engine 2056 and fifth for engine 2054. Weighing slightly more than 7,000 pounds, the main engine is the world&#8217;s largest reusable liquid rocket engine.<\/p>\n<p>During liftoff, each of the three engines consumes 132,000 gallons of liquid hydrogen and 49,000 gallons of liquid oxygen fuel. That&#8217;s more than half a million gallons of fuel during an eight-and-one-half-minute launch. If the three engines pumped water instead of fuel, they could drain an average-sized swimming pool in 25 seconds. At full power, the three engines generate as much energy as 23 Hoover Dams. They operate at temperatures ranging from minus 423 F to 6,000 F, hotter than the boiling point of iron. <\/p>\n<p>After a Shuttle mission, the engines are taken to the Space Shuttle Main Engine Processing Facility at Kennedy for post-flight inspections and maintenance. Then they are sent to NASA&#8217;s Stennis Space Center, Miss., for a pre-flight acceptance test.<\/p>\n<p>The Rocketdyne Propulsion and Power division of The Boeing Co. of Canoga Park, Calif., manufactures the main engines. Pratt and Whitney, a United Technologies Company of West Palm Beach, Fla., builds the high-pressure turbo pumps. Marshall manages the Space Shuttle Main Engine Project for the Space Shuttle Propulsion Program.<\/p>\n<p>For more information on Return to Flight visit:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/returntoflight \"   target=\"_blank\"  ><br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/returntoflight  <\/a><\/p>\n<p>For photos of engine installation visit:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/mediaarchive.ksc.nasa.gov\/search.cfm?cat=42\"   target=\"_blank\"  ><br \/>\nhttp:\/\/mediaarchive.ksc.nasa.gov\/search.cfm?cat=42  <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NASA completed installation this week of the three main engines that will help launch Space Shuttle Discovery on its Return to Flight mission. Installation was completed Dec. 8 at the&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":612598,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-NASA"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1363"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1363\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/612598"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}