![](\"http:\/\/www.esa.int\/var\/esa\/storage\/images\/esa_multimedia\/videos\/2012\/11\/esa_euronews_the_ministers_of_space\/12167285-2-eng-GB\/ESA_Euronews_The_Ministers_of_Space_small.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
The Italian city of Naples was the dramatic setting for a summit to set Europe\u2019s future in space. From rocket launchers to Mars explorers, everything was under debate \u2013 in particular, money. Ministers from the 20 member countries of the European Space Agency, including newcomers Poland, had to decide which projects are funded and how. The bargaining was intense, according to Genvi\u00e8ve Fioraso, French Minister for Higher Education and Research: \u201cTough! Negotiations are never easy. You don\u2019t have much sleep, there are opposing points of view\u2026.even if everything is prepared in advance it\u2019s like we\u2019re starting all over again. But you have to just know that, no sleep for two and a half days, and be persuasive,\u201d she commented. One of the key areas of debate concerned the future of Ariane. Late night negotiations led to a compromise, with the updated version of the launcher, known as Ariane 5ME, to go ahead, and be ready for lift off in 2017. At the same time initial studies to build Ariane 6, with a modular, flexible design, would be launched.
\n
Some of the most enthusiastic support of space projects came from the British, who are increasing their investment in ESA by 25%. The UK is targeting telecommunications: \u201cquite simply we think the satellite-based delivery of television, or broadband services, is a growing market, and we want Britain to be at the cutting edge of it\u201d, explained Minister of State for Universities and Science, David Willetts. But what about the science, amongst all this talk of money and market share? ESA member countries have to fund science, it is non-optional. However the science budget will not budge from its current 508 million euros per year. ESA left the Naples summit with the cash and political support for a 10.1 billion euro space programme for the coming few years.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
The Italian city of Naples was the dramatic setting for a summit to set Europe\u2019s future in space. From rocket launchers to Mars explorers, everything was under debate \u2013 in particular, money. Ministers from the 20 member countries of the European Space Agency, including newcomers Poland, had to decide which projects are funded and how. The bargaining was intense, according to Genvi\u00e8ve Fioraso, French Minister for Higher Education and Research: \u201cTough! Negotiations are never easy. You don\u2019t have much sleep, there are opposing points of view\u2026.even if everything is prepared in advance it\u2019s like we\u2019re starting all over again. But you have to just know that, no sleep for two and a half days, and be persuasive,\u201d she commented. One of the key areas of debate concerned the future of Ariane. Late night negotiations led to a compromise, with the updated version of the launcher, known as Ariane 5ME, to go ahead, and be ready for lift off in 2017. At the same time initial studies to build Ariane 6, with a modular, flexible design, would be launched.
\n
Some of the most enthusiastic support of space projects came from the British, who are increasing their investment in ESA by 25%. The UK is targeting telecommunications: \u201cquite simply we think the satellite-based delivery of television, or broadband services, is a growing market, and we want Britain to be at the cutting edge of it\u201d, explained Minister of State for Universities and Science, David Willetts. But what about the science, amongst all this talk of money and market share? ESA member countries have to fund science, it is non-optional. However the science budget will not budge from its current 508 million euros per year. ESA left the Naples summit with the cash and political support for a 10.1 billion euro space programme for the coming few years.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176392","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-multimedia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176392","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=176392"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176392\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=176392"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=176392"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=176392"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}