{"id":244219,"date":"2016-11-28T06:19:38","date_gmt":"2016-11-28T10:19:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ntrs.nasa.gov\/search.jsp?R=20160013709"},"modified":"2016-11-28T06:19:38","modified_gmt":"2016-11-28T10:19:38","slug":"stochastic-strength-based-damage-simulation-of-ceramic-matrix-composite-laminates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=244219","title":{"rendered":"Stochastic-Strength-Based Damage Simulation of Ceramic Matrix Composite Laminates"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: The Finite Element Analysis-Micromechanics Analysis Code\/Ceramics Analysis and Reliability Evaluation of Structures (FEAMAC\/CARES) program was used to characterize and predict the progressive damage response of silicon-carbide-fiber-reinforced reaction-bonded silicon nitride matrix (SiC\/RBSN) composite laminate tensile specimens. Studied were unidirectional laminates [0] (sub 8), [10] (sub 8), [45] (sub 8), and [90] (sub 8); cross-ply laminates [0 (sub 2) divided by 90 (sub 2),]s; angled-ply &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: The Finite Element Analysis-Micromechanics Analysis Code\/Ceramics Analysis and Reliability Evaluation of Structures (FEAMAC\/CARES) program was used to characterize and predict the progressive damage response of silicon-carbide-fiber-reinforce&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244219","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=244219"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244219\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":244220,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244219\/revisions\/244220"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=244219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=244219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=244219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}