{"id":245578,"date":"2016-07-21T09:37:00","date_gmt":"2016-07-21T13:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/watchers.news\/post-id\/49026"},"modified":"2016-07-21T09:37:00","modified_gmt":"2016-07-21T13:37:00","slug":"two-m1-solar-flares-flurry-of-c-class-erupt-from-geoeffective-region-2567","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=245578","title":{"rendered":"Two M1 solar flares, flurry of C-class erupt from geoeffective Region 2567"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After more than 3 months without any significant solar flare, our sun produced two consecutive M-class flares early on July 21, 2016. The source was Active Region 2567 (&#39;beta-gamma&#39; \/ &#39;beta&#39;), currently moving out of its geoeffective position&#8230;&#8230;. <a href=\"https:\/\/watchers.news\/2016\/07\/21\/two-m1-solar-flares-flurry-of-c-class-erupt-from-geoeffective-region-2567\/\">Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After more than 3 months without any significant solar flare, our sun produced two consecutive M-class flares early on July 21, 2016. The source was Active Region 2567 (&#8216;beta-gamma&#8217; \/ &#8216;beta&#8217;), currently moving out of its geoeffective position&#8230;&#8230;. <a href=\"https:\/\/watchers.news\/2016\/07\/21\/two-m1-solar-flares-flurry-of-c-class-erupt-from-geoeffective-region-2567\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":98,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-245578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/98"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=245578"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":245579,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245578\/revisions\/245579"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=245578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=245578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=245578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}