{"id":254094,"date":"2016-12-19T11:12:23","date_gmt":"2016-12-19T15:12:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ntrs.nasa.gov\/search.jsp?R=20160014672"},"modified":"2016-12-19T11:12:23","modified_gmt":"2016-12-19T15:12:23","slug":"global-ocean-evaporation-increases-since-1960-in-climate-reanalyses-how-accurate-are-they","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=254094","title":{"rendered":"Global Ocean Evaporation Increases Since 1960 in Climate Reanalyses: How Accurate Are They?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: AGCMs w\/ Specified SSTs (AMIPs) GEOS-5, ERA-20CM Ensembles Incorporate best historical estimates of SST, sea ice, radiative forcing Atmospheric &#8220;weather noise&#8221; is inconsistent with specified SST. Instantaneous Sfc fluxes can be wrong sign (e.g. Indian Ocean Monsoon, high latitude oceans). Averaging over ensemble members helps isolate SST-forced signal. Reduced Observational Reanalyses: NOAA 20CR V2C, ERA-20C, JRA-55C Incorporate observed Sfc Press (20CR), Marine Winds (ERA-20C) and rawinsonde&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: AGCMs w\/ Specified SSTs (AMIPs) GEOS-5, ERA-20CM Ensembles Incorporate best historical estimates of SST, sea ice, radiative forcing Atmospheric &#8220;weather noise&#8221; is inconsistent with specified SST. Instantaneous Sfc fluxes can be wrong sign (e&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-254094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=254094"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254094\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":254095,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254094\/revisions\/254095"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=254094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=254094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=254094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}