{"id":257589,"date":"2017-01-04T11:35:23","date_gmt":"2017-01-04T15:35:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/01\/170104103523.htm"},"modified":"2017-01-04T11:35:23","modified_gmt":"2017-01-04T15:35:23","slug":"out-in-the-cold-why-are-the-oldest-people-the-most-excluded","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=257589","title":{"rendered":"Out in the cold: Why are the oldest people the most excluded?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>People over the age of 85 are significantly more likely to suffer social exclusion than those in the 65 to 84-year-old bracket, according to new research. In a study of 10,000 people aged over 65, social policy researchers found the &#8216;oldest old&#8217; &#8212; those 85 and over &#8212; have more trouble accessing services such as healthcare and food shops, with 16 percent reporting &#8216;significant&#8217; problems, compared with only four percent of their younger counterparts. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>People over the age of 85 are significantly more likely to suffer social exclusion than those in the 65 to 84-year-old bracket, according to new research. In a study of 10,000 people aged over 65, social policy researchers found the &#8216;oldest old&#8217; &#8212; tho&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-257589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=257589"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257589\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":257590,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257589\/revisions\/257590"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=257589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=257589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=257589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}