{"id":260090,"date":"2017-01-11T10:40:01","date_gmt":"2017-01-11T14:40:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=ff869491294d156fc3a90c7fe59b8e22"},"modified":"2017-01-11T10:40:01","modified_gmt":"2017-01-11T14:40:01","slug":"can-the-greening-be-greener","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=260090","title":{"rendered":"Can the &#8220;greening&#8221; be greener?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The EU introduced the new &#8220;greening&#8221; instrument into the Common Agricultural Policy in 2015, with the intention to slow the rapid loss of biodiversity in agricultural areas. The idea is quite simple: in return to the subsidies they receive, farmers must now implement measures to protect wild animals and plants on their land. A group of scientists from the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), the University of G\u00f6ttingen and other German, Austrian and French institutions examined how effective the flagship greening measure called &#8220;ecological focus areas&#8221; actually is. Their conclusions, now published in the scientific journal Conservation Letters, are sobering: ecological focus areas are implemented in a way that provides little benefit for biodiversity or farmers, and yet come at a high price to tax payers. However, there are many possibilities to improve the measure for the benefit of all sides.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The EU introduced the new &#8220;greening&#8221; instrument into the Common Agricultural Policy in 2015, with the intention to slow the rapid loss of biodiversity in agricultural areas. The idea is quite simple: in return to the subsidies they receive, farmers must now implement measures to protect wild animals and plants on their land. A group of scientists from the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), the University of G&ouml;ttingen and other German, Austrian and French institutions examined how effective the flagship greening measure called &#8220;ecological focus areas&#8221; actually is. Their conclusions, now published in the scientific journal Conservation Letters, are sobering: ecological focus areas are implemented in a way that provides little benefit for biodiversity or farmers, and yet come at a high price to tax payers. However, there are many possibilities to improve the measure for the benefit of all sides.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260090","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=260090"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260090\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":260091,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260090\/revisions\/260091"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=260090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=260090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=260090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}