{"id":260134,"date":"2017-01-11T12:08:24","date_gmt":"2017-01-11T16:08:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/01\/170111110824.htm"},"modified":"2017-01-11T12:08:24","modified_gmt":"2017-01-11T16:08:24","slug":"contrary-to-decades-of-hype-curcumin-alone-is-unlikely-to-boost-health","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=260134","title":{"rendered":"Contrary to decades of hype, curcumin alone is unlikely to boost health"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Curcumin, a compound in turmeric, continues to be hailed as a natural treatment for a wide range of health conditions, including cancer and Alzheimer&#8217;s disease. But a new review of the scientific literature on curcumin has found it&#8217;s probably not all it&#8217;s ground up to be. The report instead cites evidence that, contrary to numerous reports, the compound has limited &#8212; if any &#8212; therapeutic benefit. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Curcumin, a compound in turmeric, continues to be hailed as a natural treatment for a wide range of health conditions, including cancer and Alzheimer&#8217;s disease. But a new review of the scientific literature on curcumin has found it&#8217;s probably not all i&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=260134"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260134\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":260135,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260134\/revisions\/260135"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=260134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=260134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=260134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}