{"id":260136,"date":"2017-01-11T12:08:10","date_gmt":"2017-01-11T16:08:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/01\/170111110810.htm"},"modified":"2017-01-11T12:08:10","modified_gmt":"2017-01-11T16:08:10","slug":"farthest-stars-in-milky-way-might-be-ripped-from-another-galaxy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=260136","title":{"rendered":"Farthest stars in Milky Way might be ripped from another galaxy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The 11 farthest known stars in our galaxy are located about 300,000 light-years from Earth, well outside the Milky Way&#8217;s spiral disk. New research shows that half of those stars might have been ripped from another galaxy: the Sagittarius dwarf. Moreover, they are members of a lengthy stream of stars extending one million light-years across space, or 10 times the width of our galaxy. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The 11 farthest known stars in our galaxy are located about 300,000 light-years from Earth, well outside the Milky Way&#8217;s spiral disk. New research shows that half of those stars might have been ripped from another galaxy: the Sagittarius dwarf. Moreove&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=260136"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260136\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":260137,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260136\/revisions\/260137"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=260136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=260136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=260136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}