{"id":264429,"date":"2017-01-23T10:46:46","date_gmt":"2017-01-23T14:46:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/01\/170123094646.htm"},"modified":"2017-01-23T10:46:46","modified_gmt":"2017-01-23T14:46:46","slug":"comparing-skin-closure-options-for-cesarean-delivery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=264429","title":{"rendered":"Comparing skin closure options for cesarean delivery"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers tested two types of sutures &#8212; poliglecaprone 25 (monocryl\u00ae suture) and polyglactin 910 (vicryl\u00ae suture). Monocryl is an absorbable, single filament suture with low tissue reactivity which dissolves slowly and loses strength. Vicryl is an absorbable, braided suture with low tissue reactivity which dissolves quickly but maintains strength. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers tested two types of sutures &#8212; poliglecaprone 25 (monocryl&reg; suture) and polyglactin 910 (vicryl&reg; suture). Monocryl is an absorbable, single filament suture with low tissue reactivity which dissolves slowly and loses strength. Vicryl is an absorbable, braided suture with low tissue reactivity which dissolves quickly but maintains strength.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-264429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=264429"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264429\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":264430,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264429\/revisions\/264430"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=264429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=264429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=264429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}