{"id":265627,"date":"2017-01-25T15:00:07","date_gmt":"2017-01-25T19:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=1ba2252a36cf1e03effe3e31cc93a0f6"},"modified":"2017-01-25T15:00:07","modified_gmt":"2017-01-25T19:00:07","slug":"expansion-of-australian-reserves-for-fairy-possums-might-be-at-expense-of-other-species","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=265627","title":{"rendered":"Expansion of Australian reserves for fairy possums might be at expense of other species"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Current nature reserves are not very suitable for the critically endangered Critically Endangered Leadbeater&#8217;s Possum, but expansion of nature reserves might come at the expense of other Australian forest species, according to a study published January 25, 2017 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Chris Taylor and Natasha Cadenhead from the University of Melbourne, Australia, and colleagues.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Current nature reserves are not very suitable for the critically endangered Critically Endangered Leadbeater&#8217;s Possum, but expansion of nature reserves might come at the expense of other Australian forest species, according to a study published January&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-265627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=265627"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265627\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":265628,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265627\/revisions\/265628"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=265627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=265627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=265627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}