{"id":278377,"date":"2017-02-22T11:52:36","date_gmt":"2017-02-22T15:52:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/02\/170222105236.htm"},"modified":"2017-02-22T11:52:36","modified_gmt":"2017-02-22T15:52:36","slug":"widely-accepted-vision-for-agriculture-may-be-inaccurate-misleading-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=278377","title":{"rendered":"Widely accepted vision for agriculture may be inaccurate, misleading"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8216;Food production must double by 2050 to feed the world&#8217;s growing population.&#8217; This truism has been repeated so often in recent years that it has become widely accepted among academics, policymakers and farmers, but now researchers are challenging this assertion and suggesting a new vision for the future of agriculture. New research suggests that production likely will need to increase between 25 percent and 70 percent to meet 2050 food demand. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8216;Food production must double by 2050 to feed the world&#8217;s growing population.&#8217; This truism has been repeated so often in recent years that it has become widely accepted among academics, policymakers and farmers, but now researchers are challenging this &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-278377","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278377","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=278377"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278377\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":278378,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278377\/revisions\/278378"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=278377"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=278377"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=278377"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}