{"id":283972,"date":"2017-03-07T12:28:22","date_gmt":"2017-03-07T16:28:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/03\/170307112822.htm"},"modified":"2017-03-07T12:28:22","modified_gmt":"2017-03-07T16:28:22","slug":"reducing-conducting-thin-film-surface-roughness-for-electronics-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=283972","title":{"rendered":"Reducing conducting thin film surface roughness for electronics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As transistor dimensions within integrated circuits continue to shrink, smooth metallic lines are required to interconnect these devices. If the surfaces of these tiny metal lines aren&#8217;t smooth enough, it substantially reduces their ability to conduct electrical and thermal energy &#8212; decreasing functionality. Engineers report an advance in modeling results that establish electrical surface treatment of conducting thin films as a physical processing method for reducing surface roughness. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As transistor dimensions within integrated circuits continue to shrink, smooth metallic lines are required to interconnect these devices. If the surfaces of these tiny metal lines aren&#8217;t smooth enough, it substantially reduces their ability to conduct &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-283972","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283972","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=283972"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283972\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":283973,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283972\/revisions\/283973"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=283972"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=283972"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=283972"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}