{"id":284204,"date":"2017-03-08T03:24:32","date_gmt":"2017-03-08T07:24:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=4623a8b30f200f6e636eec0a49f8906e"},"modified":"2017-03-08T03:24:32","modified_gmt":"2017-03-08T07:24:32","slug":"new-species-concept-based-on-mitochondrial-nuclear-dna-coadaptation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=284204","title":{"rendered":"New species concept based on mitochondrial &amp; nuclear DNA coadaptation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What is a species? Biologists\u2014and ornithologists in particular\u2014have been debating the best definition for a very long time. A new commentary published in The Auk: Ornithological Advances proposes a novel concept: that species can be defined based on the unique coadaptations between their two genomes, one in the nuclei of their cells and the other in their mitochondria.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What is a species? Biologists&mdash;and ornithologists in particular&mdash;have been debating the best definition for a very long time. A new commentary published in The Auk: Ornithological Advances proposes a novel concept: that species can be defined based on the unique coadaptations between their two genomes, one in the nuclei of their cells and the other in their mitochondria.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-284204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=284204"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284204\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":284205,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284204\/revisions\/284205"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=284204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=284204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=284204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}