{"id":284672,"date":"2017-03-08T13:29:14","date_gmt":"2017-03-08T17:29:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=1c583f54623156b988e1b2338f809d57"},"modified":"2017-03-08T13:36:12","modified_gmt":"2017-03-08T17:36:12","slug":"dawn-identifies-age-of-ceres-brightest-area-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=284672","title":{"rendered":"Dawn Identifies Age of Ceres&#8217; Brightest Area"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The bright central area of Ceres&#8217; Occator Crater, known as Cerealia Facula, is approximately 30 million years younger than the crater in which it lies, according to a new study in the Astronomical Journal. Scientists used data from NASA&#8217;s Dawn spacecraft to analyze Occator&#8217;s central dome in detail, concluding that this intriguing bright feature on the dwarf planet is only about 4 million years old &#8212; quite recent in terms of geological history.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The bright central area of Ceres&#8217; Occator Crater, known as Cerealia Facula, is approximately 30 million years younger than the crater in which it lies, according to a new study in the Astronomical Journal. Scientists used data from NASA&#8217;s Dawn&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-284672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=284672"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284672\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":284673,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284672\/revisions\/284673"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=284672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=284672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=284672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}