{"id":290785,"date":"2017-03-22T09:22:10","date_gmt":"2017-03-22T13:22:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/03\/170322092210.htm"},"modified":"2017-03-22T09:22:10","modified_gmt":"2017-03-22T13:22:10","slug":"how-reliable-are-traditional-wildlife-surveys-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=290785","title":{"rendered":"How reliable are traditional wildlife surveys?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To effectively manage a wildlife species, one of the most basic things you need to know is how many of them are out there. However, it&#8217;s almost never feasible to count every single individual &#8212; so how do the results of wildlife surveys compare to true population size? A new study tests this using the results of more than thirty years of surveys of the Rocky Mountain population of sandhill cranes. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To effectively manage a wildlife species, one of the most basic things you need to know is how many of them are out there. However, it&#8217;s almost never feasible to count every single individual &#8212; so how do the results of wildlife surveys compare to true&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-290785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=290785"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290785\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":290786,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290785\/revisions\/290786"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=290785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=290785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=290785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}