{"id":299544,"date":"2017-04-11T06:13:22","date_gmt":"2017-04-11T10:13:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=bca11aa017d4fb4467c65e676363c7b7"},"modified":"2017-04-11T06:13:22","modified_gmt":"2017-04-11T10:13:22","slug":"accurate-dna-misspelling-correction-method","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=299544","title":{"rendered":"Accurate DNA misspelling correction method"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers at the Institute of Basic Science (IBS) proved the accuracy of a recently developed gene editing method. This works as &#8220;DNA scissors&#8221; designed to identify and substitute just one nucleotide among the 3 billion. &#8220;It is the first time that the accuracy of this base editor has been verified at the whole genome level,&#8221; explains KIM Jin-Soo, leading author of the study. Published in Nature Biotechnology, this validation will help to expand the use of this method in agriculture, livestock, and gene therapy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers at the Institute of Basic Science (IBS) proved the accuracy of a recently developed gene editing method. This works as &#8220;DNA scissors&#8221; designed to identify and substitute just one nucleotide among the 3 billion. &#8220;It is the first time that th&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-299544","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=299544"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299544\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":299545,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299544\/revisions\/299545"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=299544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=299544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=299544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}