{"id":301229,"date":"2017-04-13T15:44:39","date_gmt":"2017-04-13T19:44:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/04\/170413154439.htm"},"modified":"2017-04-13T15:44:39","modified_gmt":"2017-04-13T19:44:39","slug":"study-examines-impact-of-common-risk-factors-on-outcomes-for-home-birth-center-births","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=301229","title":{"rendered":"Study examines impact of common risk factors on outcomes for home, birth center births"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Women with some characteristics commonly thought to increase pregnancy risks &#8212; being over age 35; being overweight; and in some cases, having a vaginal birth after a cesarean section &#8212; tend to have good outcomes when they give birth at home or in a birth center, a new assessment has found. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Women with some characteristics commonly thought to increase pregnancy risks &#8212; being over age 35; being overweight; and in some cases, having a vaginal birth after a cesarean section &#8212; tend to have good outcomes when they give birth at home or in a b&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-301229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=301229"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301229\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":301498,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301229\/revisions\/301498"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=301229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=301229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=301229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}