{"id":305804,"date":"2017-04-24T14:12:52","date_gmt":"2017-04-24T18:12:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/04\/170424141252.htm"},"modified":"2017-04-24T14:12:52","modified_gmt":"2017-04-24T18:12:52","slug":"robot-radiology-low-cost-a-i-could-screen-for-cervical-cancer-better-than-humans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=305804","title":{"rendered":"Robot radiology: Low cost A.I. could screen for cervical cancer better than humans"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Medical researchers have created a cervical cancer screening technique that, based on an analysis of a very large dataset, has the potential to perform as well or better than human interpretation on other traditional screening results, such as Pap tests and HPV tests&#8211;at a much lower cost. The technique could be used in less-developed countries, where 80% of deaths from cervical cancer occur. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Medical researchers have created a cervical cancer screening technique that, based on an analysis of a very large dataset, has the potential to perform as well or better than human interpretation on other traditional screening results, such as Pap test&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-305804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=305804"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305804\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":305805,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305804\/revisions\/305805"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=305804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=305804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=305804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}