{"id":309168,"date":"2017-05-01T12:36:42","date_gmt":"2017-05-01T16:36:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=64d6f02471c36f476b6c823635b7dd21"},"modified":"2017-05-01T12:36:42","modified_gmt":"2017-05-01T16:36:42","slug":"new-model-for-predicting-presidential-election-results-based-on-television-viewership-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=309168","title":{"rendered":"New model for predicting presidential election results based on television viewership"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A comparative study on predicting presidential election outcomes using models built on watch data for thousands of television shows has found that simple &#8220;single-show models&#8221; can have high predictive accuracy. Given the recent performance of poll-data-driven models in predicting the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the Brexit vote outcomes, models based on television viewership offer an accurate predictive tool, as reported in Big Data.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A comparative study on predicting presidential election outcomes using models built on watch data for thousands of television shows has found that simple &#8220;single-show models&#8221; can have high predictive accuracy. Given the recent performance of poll-data-&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-309168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=309168"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309168\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":309169,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309168\/revisions\/309169"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=309168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=309168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=309168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}