{"id":323125,"date":"2017-05-31T14:36:34","date_gmt":"2017-05-31T18:36:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/05\/170531143634.htm"},"modified":"2017-05-31T14:36:34","modified_gmt":"2017-05-31T18:36:34","slug":"harder-better-faster-stronger-tethered-soft-exosuit-reduces-metabolic-cost-of-running","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=323125","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Harder, better, faster, stronger&#8217;: Tethered soft exosuit reduces metabolic cost of running"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What if running the 26.2 miles of a marathon only felt like running 24.9 miles, or if you could improve your average running pace from 9:14 minutes\/mile to 8:49 minutes\/mile without weeks of training? Researchers have demonstrated that a tethered soft exosuit can reduce the metabolic cost of running on a treadmill by 5.4% compared to not wearing the exosuit, bringing those dreams of high performance closer to reality. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What if running the 26.2 miles of a marathon only felt like running 24.9 miles, or if you could improve your average running pace from 9:14 minutes\/mile to 8:49 minutes\/mile without weeks of training? Researchers have demonstrated that a tethered soft &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-323125","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323125","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=323125"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323125\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":323126,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323125\/revisions\/323126"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=323125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=323125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=323125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}