{"id":325242,"date":"2017-06-05T08:54:01","date_gmt":"2017-06-05T12:54:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/06\/170605085401.htm"},"modified":"2017-06-05T08:54:01","modified_gmt":"2017-06-05T12:54:01","slug":"natural-caesarean-section-is-safe-popular-and-feasible-and-is-not-encouraging-maternal-requests-for-c-section-births","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=325242","title":{"rendered":"Natural Caesarean section is safe, popular and feasible and is not encouraging maternal requests for C-section births"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8216;Natural Caesarean Section&#8217; &#8212; in which women enjoy enhanced contact and bonding with their baby just as they would in a vaginal birth &#8212; is safe, popular and feasible, and is not encouraging mothers to request C-section birth when it is not medically necessary, according to an expert in the field. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8216;Natural Caesarean Section&#8217; &#8212; in which women enjoy enhanced contact and bonding with their baby just as they would in a vaginal birth &#8212; is safe, popular and feasible, and is not encouraging mothers to request C-section birth when it is not medically &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-325242","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=325242"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325242\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":325243,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325242\/revisions\/325243"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=325242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=325242"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=325242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}