{"id":332566,"date":"2017-06-20T09:00:01","date_gmt":"2017-06-20T13:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=9c5b47fb6e42be483a4c4857682cd30f"},"modified":"2017-06-20T09:00:01","modified_gmt":"2017-06-20T13:00:01","slug":"rare-extreme-helium-star-identified-by-astronomers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=332566","title":{"rendered":"Rare extreme helium star identified by astronomers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(Phys.org)\u2014Astronomers have identified another rare example of an extreme helium star. The star, designated GALEX J184559.8\u2212413827 (or J1845\u22124138 for short), was initially classified as a faint helium-rich &#8220;hot subdwarf,&#8221; but new spectroscopic observations reveal that this star is more hydrogen-deficient than previously thought. The finding is available in a paper published June 11 on arXiv.org.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Phys.org)&mdash;Astronomers have identified another rare example of an extreme helium star. The star, designated GALEX J184559.8&minus;413827 (or J1845&minus;4138 for short), was initially classified as a faint helium-rich &#8220;hot subdwarf,&#8221; but new spectroscopic observations reveal that this star is more hydrogen-deficient than previously thought. The finding is available in a paper published June 11 on arXiv.org.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-332566","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332566","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=332566"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332566\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":332567,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332566\/revisions\/332567"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=332566"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=332566"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=332566"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}