{"id":339842,"date":"2017-07-04T22:46:00","date_gmt":"2017-07-05T02:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=2fb1baf8eb8a07f4070d4d0695b559d7"},"modified":"2017-07-05T00:50:33","modified_gmt":"2017-07-05T04:50:33","slug":"china-rocket-failure-likely-to-set-back-next-space-missions-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=339842","title":{"rendered":"Correction: China-Space Setback story"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>BEIJING        (AP) &#8212; In a July 4 story about the failure of China&amp;apos;s latest Long March 5 rocket launch, The Associated Press erroneously reported how an analyst described potential problems with rocket fuels. Analyst Morris Brown said the Long March 5 uses liquefied gases that are less stable than the sort of propellants used in other rockets. He did not say the propellants used in other rockets were solid&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BEIJING        (AP) &#8212; In a July 4 story about the failure of China&amp;apos;s latest Long March 5 rocket launch, The Associated Press erroneously reported how an analyst described potential problems with rocket fuels. Analyst Morris Brown said the Lon&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":419,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-339842","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339842","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/419"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=339842"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339842\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":339858,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339842\/revisions\/339858"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=339842"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=339842"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=339842"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}