{"id":342492,"date":"2017-07-11T08:19:29","date_gmt":"2017-07-11T12:19:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=13a185743509c574b6b8430f51e99d1f"},"modified":"2017-07-11T08:19:29","modified_gmt":"2017-07-11T12:19:29","slug":"synthetic-ferrimagnet-nanowires-make-more-efficient-memory-devices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=342492","title":{"rendered":"Synthetic ferrimagnet nanowires make more efficient memory devices"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Racetrack memory is a potential next-generation solution for our digital storage devices. However, current experiments using single-layer ferromagnetic nanowires are less efficient than expected. New research published in Scientific Reports shows that replacing them with a double-layered synthetic ferrimagnet nanowire reduces electric current requirements by a factor of ten, and power requirements by a factor of one hundred.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Racetrack memory is a potential next-generation solution for our digital storage devices. However, current experiments using single-layer ferromagnetic nanowires are less efficient than expected. New research published in Scientific Reports shows that &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-342492","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342492","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=342492"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342492\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":342493,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342492\/revisions\/342493"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=342492"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=342492"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=342492"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}