{"id":350,"date":"2003-05-17T21:30:08","date_gmt":"2003-05-18T02:30:08","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2003-05-17T21:30:08","modified_gmt":"2003-05-18T02:30:08","slug":"columbia-panel-issues-preliminary-findings-in-shuttle-tragedy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=350","title":{"rendered":"COLUMBIA PANEL ISSUES PRELIMINARY FINDINGS IN SHUTTLE TRAGEDY"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The space shuttle Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) has released what it&#8217;s calling &#8220;a working scenario&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.caib.us\/news\/press_releases\/pr030506.html \"   target=\"_blank\"  > http:\/\/www.caib.us\/news\/press_releases\/pr030506.html  <\/a>  to explain the February 1 tragedy that claimed the lives of seven astronauts&#8211;three of them Amateur Radio licensees.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nPreliminary findings, based on three months of &#8220;intense investigation,&#8221; suggest that just over a minute into the January 16 launch, a piece of foam insulation from the shuttle&#8217;s external fuel tank struck and damaged the lower left wing reinforced carbon-carbon (RCC) panels. The CAIB says its evidence indicates that a breach in the same area of the left wing allowed hot gases to flow into the wing during re-entry into Earth&#8217;s atmosphere, eventually leading to the spacecraft&#8217;s destruction.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The CAIB is continuing testing and analyses to refine the working scenario,&#8221; NASA said. The independent investigation board&#8211;headed by retired US Navy Adm Harold Gehman&#8211;will issue its final report this summer. Gehman told reporters earlier this month that his panel has been careful not to say that the piece of insulation knocked a hole in the leading edge of the orbiter&#8217;s wing &#8220;because we can&#8217;t prove it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In an effort to pin down that probability, investigators at Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio has been using a gas-fired cannon to shoot pieces of insulating foam at actual shuttle RCC and insulating tile components.<\/p>\n<p>Lost in the February 1 disaster were Columbia Commander Rick Husband; Pilot Willie McCool; Mission Specialists Kalpana &#8220;KC&#8221; Chawla, KD5ESI; David Brown, KC5ZTC; Laurel Clark, KC5ZSU; and Michael Anderson; and Payload Specialist Ilan Ramon&#8211;an Israeli astronaut.<\/p>\n<p>The Columbia started to break up over the southwestern US as it entered the earth&#8217;s atmosphere on the return leg of its 16-day science mission. Many Amateur Radio volunteers provided communication support during the early days of the shuttle debris recovery effort. NASA and Amateur Radio have a longstanding relationship through the Shuttle Amateur Radio EXperiment (SAREX) and Amateur Radio on the International Space Station (ARISS) programs.<\/p>\n<p>More information is available via the NASA Human Spaceflight Web page<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.spaceflight.nasa.gov\/\"   target=\"_blank\"  ><br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.spaceflight.nasa.gov\/  <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The space shuttle Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) has released what it&#8217;s calling &#8220;a working scenario&#8221; http:\/\/www.caib.us\/news\/press_releases\/pr030506.html to explain the February 1 tragedy that claimed the lives of seven astronauts&#8211;three&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":612599,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-350","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/350","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=350"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/350\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/612599"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=350"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=350"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=350"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}