{"id":352427,"date":"2017-07-31T13:42:23","date_gmt":"2017-07-31T17:42:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/07\/170731134223.htm"},"modified":"2017-07-31T13:42:23","modified_gmt":"2017-07-31T17:42:23","slug":"scientists-challenge-next-generation-sequencing-dogma","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=352427","title":{"rendered":"Scientists challenge next-generation sequencing dogma"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Next-generation sequencing &#8212; the ability to sequence millions or billions of small fragments of DNA in parallel &#8212; has revolutionized the biological sciences, playing an essential role in everything from locating mutations that cause human disease to determining how a newly discovered animal fits into the tree of life. But a new study reveals that a favored sequencing method for measuring microbial biodiversity is not as accurate as once thought. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Next-generation sequencing &#8212; the ability to sequence millions or billions of small fragments of DNA in parallel &#8212; has revolutionized the biological sciences, playing an essential role in everything from locating mutations that cause human disease to &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-352427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=352427"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352427\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":352428,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352427\/revisions\/352428"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=352427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=352427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=352427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}