{"id":353571,"date":"2017-08-03T05:59:01","date_gmt":"2017-08-03T09:59:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=60579e248774cac1e6a87fdb08414eac"},"modified":"2017-08-03T05:59:01","modified_gmt":"2017-08-03T09:59:01","slug":"team-sets-new-record-for-magnetic-tape-storage-makes-tape-competitive-for-cloud-storage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=353571","title":{"rendered":"Team sets new record for magnetic tape storage\u2014makes tape competitive for cloud storage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Research scientists have achieved a new world record in tape storage \u2013 their fifth since 2006. The new record of 201 Gb\/in2 (gigabits per square inch) in areal density was achieved on a prototype sputtered magnetic tape developed by Sony Storage Media Solutions. The scientists presented the achievement today at the 28th Magnetic Recording Conference (TMRC 2017) here.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Research scientists have achieved a new world record in tape storage &ndash; their fifth since 2006. The new record of 201 Gb\/in2 (gigabits per square inch) in areal density was achieved on a prototype sputtered magnetic tape developed by Sony Storage Media Solutions. The scientists presented the achievement today at the 28th Magnetic Recording Conference (TMRC 2017) here.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-353571","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353571","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=353571"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353571\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":353572,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353571\/revisions\/353572"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=353571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=353571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=353571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}