{"id":354626,"date":"2017-08-04T14:44:59","date_gmt":"2017-08-04T18:44:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=4323545413ed905c40988188eed7a106"},"modified":"2017-08-04T14:44:59","modified_gmt":"2017-08-04T18:44:59","slug":"recreating-the-wild-de-extinction-technology-and-the-ethics-of-conservation-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=354626","title":{"rendered":"Recreating the wild: De-extinction, technology, and the ethics of conservation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Is extinction forever? Efforts are under way to use gene editing and other tools of biotechnology to &#8220;recreate&#8221; extinct species such as the woolly mammoth and the passenger pigeon. Could such &#8220;de-extinction&#8221; initiatives aid conservation by reviving species lost to habitat destruction and climate change? Or are they more likely to hinder conservation? What should the guiding ideals of conservation be in a new age of biotechnology? These are some of the questions addressed in Recreating the Wild: De-extinction, Technology, and the Ethics of Conservation, a new special report of the Hastings Center Report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Is extinction forever? Efforts are under way to use gene editing and other tools of biotechnology to &#8220;recreate&#8221; extinct species such as the woolly mammoth and the passenger pigeon. Could such &#8220;de-extinction&#8221; initiatives aid conservation by reviving spe&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-354626","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354626","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=354626"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354626\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":354627,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354626\/revisions\/354627"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=354626"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=354626"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=354626"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}