{"id":374841,"date":"2017-09-18T12:35:49","date_gmt":"2017-09-18T16:35:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/09\/170918123549.htm"},"modified":"2017-09-18T12:35:49","modified_gmt":"2017-09-18T16:35:49","slug":"just-squeeze-in-when-spaces-are-tight-nature-loosens-its-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=374841","title":{"rendered":"Just squeeze in &#8212; when spaces are tight, nature loosens its laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It turns out that when they&#8217;re in a hurry and space is limited, ions, like people, will find a way to cram in &#8212; even if that means defying nature&#8217;s norms. Researchers have now shown that the charged particles will actually forgo their &#8216;opposites attract&#8217; behavior, called Coulombic ordering, when confined in the tiny pores of a nanomaterial. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It turns out that when they&#8217;re in a hurry and space is limited, ions, like people, will find a way to cram in &#8212; even if that means defying nature&#8217;s norms. Researchers have now shown that the charged particles will actually forgo their &#8216;opposites attra&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-374841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=374841"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374841\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":374842,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374841\/revisions\/374842"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=374841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=374841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=374841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}