{"id":380525,"date":"2017-09-28T15:41:44","date_gmt":"2017-09-28T19:41:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=d3983ad97ff2b4f8cd8689a9556fa7c2"},"modified":"2017-09-28T15:41:44","modified_gmt":"2017-09-28T19:41:44","slug":"hubble-observes-the-farthest-active-inbound-comet-yet-seen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=380525","title":{"rendered":"Hubble observes the farthest active inbound comet yet seen"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>NASA&#8217;s Hubble Space Telescope has photographed the farthest active inbound comet ever seen, at a whopping distance of 1.5 billion miles from the Sun (beyond Saturn&#8217;s orbit). Slightly warmed by the remote Sun, it has already begun to develop an 80,000-mile-wide fuzzy cloud of dust, called a coma, enveloping a tiny, solid nucleus of frozen gas and dust. These observations represent the earliest signs of activity ever seen from a comet entering the solar system&#8217;s planetary zone for the first time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NASA&#8217;s Hubble Space Telescope has photographed the farthest active inbound comet ever seen, at a whopping distance of 1.5 billion miles from the Sun (beyond Saturn&#8217;s orbit). Slightly warmed by the remote Sun, it has already begun to develop an 80,000-m&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-380525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=380525"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380525\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":380526,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380525\/revisions\/380526"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=380525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=380525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=380525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}