{"id":395787,"date":"2017-10-30T12:46:25","date_gmt":"2017-10-30T16:46:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=8e165c0afa2f32805f0316be2d87e46e"},"modified":"2017-10-30T12:46:25","modified_gmt":"2017-10-30T16:46:25","slug":"white-rot-fungis-size-explained-by-breadth-of-gene-families-involved","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=395787","title":{"rendered":"White rot fungi&#8217;s size explained by breadth of gene families involved"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Among the contenders for the world&#8217;s largest living organism is something usually considered much smaller than a blue whale, or a towering sequoia. This particular organism is so big, one needs an aerial map to grasp its size, and even then it&#8217;s not completely visible as most of it is underground. It&#8217;s a specimen of the fungus Armillaria ostoyae, first discovered two decades ago though thought to be a few millennia old by then, and so large it is spread over nearly four square miles &#8211; a space equivalent to one-sixth of Manhattan, or nearly 8,300 Olympic-sized swimming pools &#8211; and weighs as much as three blue whales combined.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Among the contenders for the world&#8217;s largest living organism is something usually considered much smaller than a blue whale, or a towering sequoia. This particular organism is so big, one needs an aerial map to grasp its size, and even then it&#8217;s not co&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-395787","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395787","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=395787"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395787\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":395788,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395787\/revisions\/395788"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=395787"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=395787"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=395787"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}