{"id":396219,"date":"2017-10-30T10:19:13","date_gmt":"2017-10-30T14:19:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ntrs.nasa.gov\/search.jsp?R=20170010258"},"modified":"2017-10-30T10:19:13","modified_gmt":"2017-10-30T14:19:13","slug":"evaluating-micrometeoroid-and-orbital-debris-risk-assessments-using-anomaly-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=396219","title":{"rendered":"Evaluating Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris Risk Assessments Using Anomaly Data"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: The accuracy of micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) risk assessments can be difficult to evaluate. A team from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) has completed a study that compared MMOD-related failures on operational satellites to predictions of how many of those failures should occur using NASA&#8217;s TM&#8221;s MMOD risk assessment methodology and tools. The study team used the Poisson probability to quantify the degree of inconsistency&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: The accuracy of micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) risk assessments can be difficult to evaluate. A team from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) has completed a study that compa&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-396219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396219","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=396219"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396219\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":396220,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396219\/revisions\/396220"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=396219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=396219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=396219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}