{"id":397123,"date":"2017-11-01T12:56:17","date_gmt":"2017-11-01T16:56:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=a3a64bba1a17eb995deb0baf8fe7ec1d"},"modified":"2017-11-01T12:56:17","modified_gmt":"2017-11-01T16:56:17","slug":"new-mathematical-models-could-help-solve-few-body-problems-in-physics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=397123","title":{"rendered":"New mathematical models could help solve few-body problems in physics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In physics, the conundrum known as the &#8220;few-body problem,&#8221; how three or more interacting particles behave, has bedeviled scientists for centuries. Equations that describe the physics of few-body systems are usually unsolvable and the methods used to find solutions are unstable. There aren&#8217;t many equations that can probe the wide spectrum of possible few-particle dynamics. A new family of mathematical models for mixtures of quantum particles could help light the way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In physics, the conundrum known as the &#8220;few-body problem,&#8221; how three or more interacting particles behave, has bedeviled scientists for centuries. Equations that describe the physics of few-body systems are usually unsolvable and the methods used to fi&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-397123","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397123","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=397123"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397123\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":397124,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397123\/revisions\/397124"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=397123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=397123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=397123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}