{"id":399676,"date":"2017-11-07T10:14:36","date_gmt":"2017-11-07T14:14:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=93ee99aa22b8be38fb523c6ebe1543b2"},"modified":"2017-11-07T10:14:36","modified_gmt":"2017-11-07T14:14:36","slug":"future-robots-wont-resemble-humans-were-too-inefficient","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=399676","title":{"rendered":"Future robots won&#8217;t resemble humans &ndash; we&#8217;re too inefficient"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Humanoid robots are a vanity project: an attempt to create artificial life in our own image \u2013 essentially trying to play God. The problem is, we&#8217;re not very good at it.  Ask someone on the street to name a robot and you might hear &#8220;Terminator&#8221;, &#8220;the Cybermen&#8221; or &#8220;that gold one from Star Wars&#8221;.  What you&#8217;re not going to be given are names like Tesla Model X, Cassini or DJI Inspire 2. These are all robots, but they don&#8217;t follow the sci-fi narrative of what robots should be like. The fact is, the robots of the near future won&#8217;t be going about on two legs like the shuffling C3PO. And they&#8217;ll be much more efficient than us bipeds.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Humanoid robots are a vanity project: an attempt to create artificial life in our own image &ndash; essentially trying to play God. The problem is, we&#8217;re not very good at it.  Ask someone on the street to name a robot and you might hear &#8220;Terminator&#8221;, &#8220;the Cybermen&#8221; or &#8220;that gold one from Star Wars&#8221;.  What you&#8217;re not going to be given are names like Tesla Model X, Cassini or DJI Inspire 2. These are all robots, but they don&#8217;t follow the sci-fi narrative of what robots should be like. The fact is, the robots of the near future won&#8217;t be going about on two legs like the shuffling C3PO. And they&#8217;ll be much more efficient than us bipeds.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-399676","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=399676"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399676\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":399677,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399676\/revisions\/399677"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=399676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=399676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=399676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}