{"id":403272,"date":"2017-11-14T13:00:33","date_gmt":"2017-11-14T17:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=fd7b64edc8a4a0b012ce794ebc545bb6"},"modified":"2017-11-14T13:00:33","modified_gmt":"2017-11-14T17:00:33","slug":"low-dose-constant-drip-pharmaceutical-and-personal-care-pollution-impacts-aquatic-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=403272","title":{"rendered":"Low dose, constant drip: Pharmaceutical and personal care pollution impacts aquatic life"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Traditional toxicity testing underestimates the risk that pharmaceutical and personal care product pollution poses to freshwater ecosystems. Criteria that account for ecological disruption &#8211; not just organism death &#8211; are needed to protect surface waters, which are under pressure from a growing population and escalating synthetic chemical use. So reports a new study published this week in Elementa.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Traditional toxicity testing underestimates the risk that pharmaceutical and personal care product pollution poses to freshwater ecosystems. Criteria that account for ecological disruption &#8211; not just organism death &#8211; are needed to protect surface water&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-403272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/403272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=403272"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/403272\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":403273,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/403272\/revisions\/403273"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=403272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=403272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=403272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}