{"id":403766,"date":"2017-11-15T09:20:01","date_gmt":"2017-11-15T13:20:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=66e02ff0d411b0028e5ead916a1d76f1"},"modified":"2017-11-15T09:20:01","modified_gmt":"2017-11-15T13:20:01","slug":"facebook-wants-your-nude-photos-to-prevent-revenge-porn-heres-why-you-should-be-sceptical","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=403766","title":{"rendered":"Facebook wants your nude photos to prevent &#8216;revenge porn&#8217; &ndash; here&#8217;s why you should be sceptical"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Facebook&#8217;s latest attempt to tackle the non-consensual sharing of sexual pictures (often known as &#8220;revenge porn&#8221;) appeared so wrong-headed that at first it seemed like a joke. But the social network has made clear its system of asking users to send in explicit images that they don&#8217;t want to appear on the site is a real pilot programme being tested in Australia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Facebook&#8217;s latest attempt to tackle the non-consensual sharing of sexual pictures (often known as &#8220;revenge porn&#8221;) appeared so wrong-headed that at first it seemed like a joke. But the social network has made clear its system of asking users to send in &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-403766","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/403766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=403766"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/403766\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":403767,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/403766\/revisions\/403767"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=403766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=403766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=403766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}