{"id":404229,"date":"2017-11-15T16:56:22","date_gmt":"2017-11-15T20:56:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/11\/171115155622.htm"},"modified":"2017-11-15T16:56:22","modified_gmt":"2017-11-15T20:56:22","slug":"aging-tests-yield-varying-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=404229","title":{"rendered":"Aging tests yield varying results"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A lot of people seem willing to spend hundreds to find out whether they&#8217;re aging faster or slower than their chronological age would suggest. Unfortunately, they&#8217;re just going to have to wait and see. A head-to-head comparison of 11 different measures of aging, including blood and chromosome tests like those being sold commercially, has found that they don&#8217;t agree with one another on how fast a given person is growing older. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A lot of people seem willing to spend hundreds to find out whether they&#8217;re aging faster or slower than their chronological age would suggest. Unfortunately, they&#8217;re just going to have to wait and see. A head-to-head comparison of 11 different measures &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-404229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/404229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=404229"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/404229\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":404230,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/404229\/revisions\/404230"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=404229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=404229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=404229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}