{"id":410060,"date":"2017-11-29T13:02:35","date_gmt":"2017-11-29T17:02:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/11\/171129120235.htm"},"modified":"2017-11-29T13:02:35","modified_gmt":"2017-11-29T17:02:35","slug":"to-improve-dipstick-diagnostic-and-environmental-tests-just-add-tape-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=410060","title":{"rendered":"To improve dipstick diagnostic and environmental tests, just add tape"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Simple paper-strip testing has the potential to tell us quickly what&#8217;s in water, and other liquid samples from food, the environment and bodies &#8212; but current tests don&#8217;t handle solid samples well. Now researchers have developed a way to make these low-cost devices more versatile and reliable for analyzing both liquid and solid samples using adhesive tape. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Simple paper-strip testing has the potential to tell us quickly what&#8217;s in water, and other liquid samples from food, the environment and bodies &#8212; but current tests don&#8217;t handle solid samples well. Now researchers have developed a way to make these low&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-410060","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/410060","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=410060"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/410060\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":410061,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/410060\/revisions\/410061"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=410060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=410060"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=410060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}