{"id":418906,"date":"2017-12-18T10:09:25","date_gmt":"2017-12-18T14:09:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/12\/171218090925.htm"},"modified":"2017-12-18T10:09:25","modified_gmt":"2017-12-18T14:09:25","slug":"primitive-fossil-bear-with-a-sweet-tooth-identified-from-canadas-high-arctic-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=418906","title":{"rendered":"Primitive fossil bear with a sweet tooth identified from Canada&#8217;s High Arctic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers have identified remains of a 3.5-million-year-old bear from a fossil-rich site in Canada&#8217;s High Arctic. Their study shows not only that the animal is a close relative of the ancestor of modern bears &#8212; tracing its ancestry to extinct bears of similar age from East Asia &#8212; but that it also had a sweet tooth, as determined by cavities in the teeth. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers have identified remains of a 3.5-million-year-old bear from a fossil-rich site in Canada&#8217;s High Arctic. Their study shows not only that the animal is a close relative of the ancestor of modern bears &#8212; tracing its ancestry to extinct bears &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-418906","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=418906"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418906\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":418907,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418906\/revisions\/418907"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=418906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=418906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=418906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}