{"id":437800,"date":"2018-02-08T11:42:36","date_gmt":"2018-02-08T15:42:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2018\/02\/180208104236.htm"},"modified":"2018-02-08T11:42:36","modified_gmt":"2018-02-08T15:42:36","slug":"from-black-hat-to-white-hat-findings-tip-assumptions-about-tak1-in-muscle-growth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=437800","title":{"rendered":"From black hat to white hat: Findings tip assumptions about TAK1 in muscle growth"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Convention was that the signaling protein, transforming growth factor-\u00df-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) is detrimental to muscle health since it activates pathways associated with muscle wasting. However deactivating TAK1 did not preserve muscle health as expected, but resulted in the opposite effect: muscle wasting. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Convention was that the signaling protein, transforming growth factor-&szlig;-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) is detrimental to muscle health since it activates pathways associated with muscle wasting. However deactivating TAK1 did not preserve muscle health as expected, but resulted in the opposite effect: muscle wasting.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-437800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/437800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=437800"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/437800\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":437801,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/437800\/revisions\/437801"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=437800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=437800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=437800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}