{"id":439631,"date":"2018-02-13T09:44:08","date_gmt":"2018-02-13T13:44:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2018\/02\/180213084408.htm"},"modified":"2018-02-13T09:44:08","modified_gmt":"2018-02-13T13:44:08","slug":"when-it-comes-to-extinction-body-size-matters-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=439631","title":{"rendered":"When it comes to extinction, body size matters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Models for extinction risk are necessarily simple. Most reduce complex ecological systems to a linear relationship between resource density and population growth &#8212; something that can be broadly applied to infer how much resource loss a species can survive. This week in Nature Communications, an interdisciplinary team of scientists proposes a more nuanced model for extinction that also shows why animal species tend to evolve toward larger body sizes. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Models for extinction risk are necessarily simple. Most reduce complex ecological systems to a linear relationship between resource density and population growth &#8212; something that can be broadly applied to infer how much resource loss a species can sur&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-439631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/439631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=439631"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/439631\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":439632,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/439631\/revisions\/439632"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=439631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=439631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=439631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}