{"id":444273,"date":"2018-02-23T08:18:44","date_gmt":"2018-02-23T12:18:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=2a655a4d20af84606cae0c99ecd0435b"},"modified":"2018-02-23T08:18:44","modified_gmt":"2018-02-23T12:18:44","slug":"developing-reliable-quantum-computers-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=444273","title":{"rendered":"Developing reliable quantum computers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Quantum computers may one day solve algorithmic problems that even the biggest supercomputers today can&#8217;t manage. But how do you test a quantum computer to ensure it is working reliably? Depending on the algorithmic task, this could be an easy or a very difficult certification problem. An international team of researchers has taken an important step towards solving a difficult variation of this problem, using a statistical approach developed at the University of Freiburg. The results of their study are published in the latest edition of Nature Photonics.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Quantum computers may one day solve algorithmic problems that even the biggest supercomputers today can&#8217;t manage. But how do you test a quantum computer to ensure it is working reliably? Depending on the algorithmic task, this could be an easy or a ver&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-444273","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444273","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=444273"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444273\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":444274,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444273\/revisions\/444274"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=444273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=444273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=444273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}