{"id":449235,"date":"2018-03-07T15:13:37","date_gmt":"2018-03-07T19:13:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2018\/03\/180307141337.htm"},"modified":"2018-03-07T15:13:37","modified_gmt":"2018-03-07T19:13:37","slug":"were-not-addicted-to-smartphones-were-addicted-to-social-interaction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=449235","title":{"rendered":"We&#8217;re not addicted to smartphones, we&#8217;re addicted to social interaction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Mobile-device habits may not be anti-social, but rather hyper-social &#8212; stemming from a healthy human need to socialize. This is the finding of a new review of the dysfunctional use of smart technology, which concludes that the most addictive smartphone functions all share a common theme: they tap into the human desire to connect with other people. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mobile-device habits may not be anti-social, but rather hyper-social &#8212; stemming from a healthy human need to socialize. This is the finding of a new review of the dysfunctional use of smart technology, which concludes that the most addictive smartphon&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-449235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/449235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=449235"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/449235\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":449236,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/449235\/revisions\/449236"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=449235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=449235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=449235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}