{"id":450799,"date":"2018-03-12T15:54:24","date_gmt":"2018-03-12T19:54:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2018\/03\/180312155424.htm"},"modified":"2018-03-12T15:54:24","modified_gmt":"2018-03-12T19:54:24","slug":"crisis-or-self-correction-rethinking-how-the-media-cover-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=450799","title":{"rendered":"Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking how the media cover science"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the recurring media narratives about the nature of science today is that it is &#8216;broken&#8217; or &#8216;in crisis.&#8217; But an analysis of how the media cover science news argues that generalizations about a crisis in science aren&#8217;t justified by the available evidence. The essay proposes that those who communicate science, including journalists, scholars and scientists themselves, should more accurately convey its investigatory nature, the self-correction process, and corrective measures without legitimizing a faulty narrative. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the recurring media narratives about the nature of science today is that it is &#8216;broken&#8217; or &#8216;in crisis.&#8217; But an analysis of how the media cover science news argues that generalizations about a crisis in science aren&#8217;t justified by the available e&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-450799","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/450799","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=450799"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/450799\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":450800,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/450799\/revisions\/450800"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=450799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=450799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=450799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}