{"id":463756,"date":"2018-04-16T16:18:14","date_gmt":"2018-04-16T20:18:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=f733ba98d98c5dbe3f007e6e62af1cd9"},"modified":"2018-04-16T16:18:14","modified_gmt":"2018-04-16T20:18:14","slug":"first-an-alga-then-a-squid-enigmatic-fossil-is-actually-a-fish","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=463756","title":{"rendered":"First an alga, then a squid, enigmatic fossil is actually a fish"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A fossil slab discovered in Kansas 70 years ago and twice misidentified\u2014first as a green alga and then as a cephalopod\u2014has been reinterpreted as the preserved remains of a large cartilaginous fish, the group that includes sharks and rays. In a study published in the Journal of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History researchers describe the fishy characteristics of the animal, which lived between 70-85 million years ago.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A fossil slab discovered in Kansas 70 years ago and twice misidentified&mdash;first as a green alga and then as a cephalopod&mdash;has been reinterpreted as the preserved remains of a large cartilaginous fish, the group that includes sharks and rays. In a study published in the Journal of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History researchers describe the fishy characteristics of the animal, which lived between 70-85 million years ago.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-463756","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/463756","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=463756"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/463756\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":463757,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/463756\/revisions\/463757"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=463756"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=463756"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=463756"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}