{"id":47,"date":"2002-12-09T20:34:27","date_gmt":"2002-12-10T01:34:27","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2002-12-09T20:34:27","modified_gmt":"2002-12-10T01:34:27","slug":"featherweight-jupiter-moon-is-likely-a-jumble-of-pieces","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=47","title":{"rendered":"FEATHERWEIGHT JUPITER MOON IS LIKELY A JUMBLE OF PIECES"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>     NASA&#8217;s Galileo spacecraft continues to deliver surprises.  Galileo&#8217;s seven-year run of discoveries continued  with the discovery of Jupiter&#8217;s potato-shaped inner moon  named Amalthea. It appears the moon has a very low density,  indicating it is full of holes.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\n &#8220;The density is unexpectedly low,&#8221; said Dr. John D. Anderson,  an astronomer at NASA&#8217;s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL),  Pasadena, Calif.  &#8220;Amalthea is apparently a loosely packed pile of rubble, he said.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The empty gaps between solid chunks likely take up more of  the moon&#8217;s total volume than the solid pieces, and even the  chunks are probably material that is not dense enough to fit  some theories about the origin of Jupiter&#8217;s moons.  &#8220;Amalthea  now seems more likely to be mostly rock with maybe a little  ice, rather than a denser mix of rock and iron,&#8221; said JPL&#8217;s  Dr. Torrence Johnson, project scientist for Galileo. <\/p>\n<p>This red-tinted moon measures about 270 kilometers (168  miles) in length and half that in width. Anderson and  colleagues estimated Amalthea&#8217;s mass from its gravitational  affect on Galileo, when the spacecraft passed within about 160 kilometers (99 miles) of the moon on Nov. 5.  Dr. Peter  Thomas at Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., had calculated  Amalthea&#8217;s volume from earlier Galileo images of the moon.  <\/p>\n<p>Amalthea&#8217;s overall density is close to the density of water  ice, Anderson reports today at the fall meeting of the  American Geophysical Union in San Francisco.  However, the  moon is almost certainly not a solid hunk of ice. &#8220;Nothing in  the Jupiter system would suggest a composition that&#8217;s mainly ice,&#8221; Anderson said.<\/p>\n<p>Amalthea&#8217;s irregular shape and low density suggests the moon  has been broken into many pieces that cling together from the  pull of each other&#8217;s gravity, mixed with empty spaces, where the pieces don&#8217;t fit tightly together.  &#8220;It&#8217;s probably boulder-size or larger pieces just touching each other, not  pressing hard together,&#8221; Anderson said.<\/p>\n<p>Johnson said, &#8220;This finding supports the idea that the inner  moons of Jupiter have undergone intense bombardment and  breakup. Amalthea may have formed originally as one piece,  but then was busted to bits by collisions.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Amalthea does not have quite enough mass to pull itself  together into a consolidated, spherical body like Earth&#8217;s  moon or Jupiter&#8217;s four largest moons. The density estimate,  obtained from Galileo&#8217;s flyby, extends an emerging pattern of  finding irregularly shaped moons and asteroids to be porous  rubble piles. What&#8217;s more of a surprise, Johnson and Anderson  said, is the density estimate is so low that even the solid  parts of Amalthea are apparently less dense than Io, a larger  moon that orbits about twice as far from Jupiter.<\/p>\n<p>One model for the formation of Jupiter&#8217;s moons suggests moons  closer to the planet would be made of denser material than  those farther out. That&#8217;s based on a theory that early  Jupiter, like a weaker version of the early Sun, would have emitted enough heat to prevent volatile, low-density material  from condensing and being incorporated into the closer moons.  Jupiter&#8217;s four largest moons fit this model, with the innermost of them, Io, also the densest, made mainly of rock  and iron. However, the new finding suggests, even if Amalthea  is mostly gaps, its solid chunks have less density than Io.<\/p>\n<p>Galileo&#8217;s flyby of Amalthea brought the spacecraft closest to  Jupiter since it began orbiting the giant planet on Dec. 7, 1995. After more than 30 close encounters with Jupiter&#8217;s four largest moons, the flyby was the last for Galileo. Galileo has been put on course for a mission-ending impact with Jupiter on Sept. 21, 2003. Galileo&#8217;s long and successful career will come to an end on the Jovian surface. The spacecraft, although still controllable from Earth, is running out of propellant. Researchers are looking forward to more surprises and new data, as Galileo approaches the foreboding giant planet.   <\/p>\n<p>Galileo left Earth aboard NASA&#8217;s Space Shuttle Atlantis in 1989. JPL, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages the Galileo mission for NASA&#8217;s Office of Space Science, Washington. Additional information about the mission is available online at:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/galileo.jpl.nasa.gov\" target=\"_blank\" ><br \/>\nhttp:\/\/galileo.jpl.nasa.gov <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NASA&#8217;s Galileo spacecraft continues to deliver surprises. Galileo&#8217;s seven-year run of discoveries continued with the discovery of Jupiter&#8217;s potato-shaped inner moon named Amalthea. It appears the moon has a very&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":612598,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-NASA"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=47"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/612598"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=47"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=47"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=47"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}