{"id":477031,"date":"2018-05-17T11:38:15","date_gmt":"2018-05-17T15:38:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2018\/05\/180517113815.htm"},"modified":"2018-05-17T11:38:15","modified_gmt":"2018-05-17T15:38:15","slug":"buyer-beware-some-water-filter-pitchers-much-better-at-toxin-removal-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=477031","title":{"rendered":"Buyer beware: Some water-filter pitchers much better at toxin removal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Scientists compared three popular pitcher brands&#8217; ability to clear dangerous microcystins from tap water. They found that while one did an excellent job, other pitchers allowed the toxins &#8212; which appear during harmful algal blooms (HABs) &#8212; to escape the filter and drop into the drinking water. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Scientists compared three popular pitcher brands&#8217; ability to clear dangerous microcystins from tap water. They found that while one did an excellent job, other pitchers allowed the toxins &#8212; which appear during harmful algal blooms (HABs) &#8212; to escape &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-477031","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/477031","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=477031"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/477031\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":477032,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/477031\/revisions\/477032"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=477031"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=477031"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=477031"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}