{"id":482079,"date":"2018-06-04T11:00:29","date_gmt":"2018-06-04T15:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=766616fd7014031d2f8d22317699852f"},"modified":"2018-06-04T11:00:29","modified_gmt":"2018-06-04T15:00:29","slug":"nist-atomic-clock-comparison-confirms-key-assumptions-of-einsteins-elevator","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=482079","title":{"rendered":"NIST atomic clock comparison confirms key assumptions of &#8216;Einstein&#8217;s elevator&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By comparing different types of remote atomic clocks, physicists at the National Institute of Standardsand Technology (NIST) have performed the most accurate test ever of a key principle underlying AlbertEinstein&#8217;s famous theory of general relativity, which describes how gravity relates to space and time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By comparing different types of remote atomic clocks, physicists at the National Institute of Standardsand Technology (NIST) have performed the most accurate test ever of a key principle underlying AlbertEinstein&#8217;s famous theory of general relativity, &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-482079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/482079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=482079"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/482079\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":482228,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/482079\/revisions\/482228"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=482079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=482079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=482079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}