{"id":483868,"date":"2018-06-07T07:44:10","date_gmt":"2018-06-07T11:44:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?guid=6b75a5159c431a17fcd4e12121d293ca"},"modified":"2018-06-07T07:44:10","modified_gmt":"2018-06-07T11:44:10","slug":"double-layered-porous-nanotubes-with-spatially-separated-photoredox-surfaces","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=483868","title":{"rendered":"Double-layered porous nanotubes with spatially separated photoredox surfaces"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Solar energy conversion of water into H2 through photocatalysis is considered a promising approach for H2 production. However, the separation efficiency of charge carriers is the key to improving the efficiency of photocatalytic hydrogen production. A recent study reveals that the double-layered porous nanotubes with spatially separated photoredox surfaces were synthesized by a self-template strategy and show enhanced photocatalytic activity toward hydrogen production.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Solar energy conversion of water into H2 through photocatalysis is considered a promising approach for H2 production. However, the separation efficiency of charge carriers is the key to improving the efficiency of photocatalytic hydrogen production. A &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":615444,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-483868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/483868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=483868"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/483868\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":483870,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/483868\/revisions\/483870"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/615444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=483868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=483868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=483868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}